Logo Crowlight Partners

Call us in Germany
+49 228 707 8670

Call us in Switzerland
+41 32 510 4122

We’ll take your call 24/7
Mon-Sun: 0.00-24.00

Author: Hrvoje Zaric

  • Negotiating the System, Not Just the Deal

    Negotiating the System, Not Just the Deal

    When you walk into a negotiation, it might look like two individuals sitting across from each other, but in reality it is two systems negotiating through human agents.

    Your negotiation counterpart is backed — and bound — by their organization. They serve internal con­sti­tuents, follow incentives, and face constraints that may never be fully disclosed. And you, whether you realize it or not, do the same.

    Yet most people prepare for negotiations as if it were just about them and the other person. That is a costly mistake.

    Why Rational Deals Fall Apart

    Plenty of deals make perfect sense — and still col­lapse. Why?

    Because people don’t negotiate in a vacuum. There’s a difference between negotiating on your own behalf — say, when you sell your car or buy a house — and a B2B negotiation. The latter is a negotiation within a system of pressures, biases and internal politics.

    Consider this:

    • Even if your counterpart knows the deal makes sense for both sides, they may still need to convince others internally. Sometimes, deci­sion-makers are too far removed to see the value. Other times, internal stakeholders block the deal because they feel threatened in their position.
    • They may be optimizing for their own KPIs, fo­cusing on what helps them personally, not what’s best for the deal. Depending on the pre­vailing company culture, self-interest can quickly over­ride the greater good for the com­pany.
    • Or they may be pushed to chase short-term wins, which aligns with the short-termism in­side their organization, but undermines long-term value for both sides. Who hasn’t seen this happen?

    And let’s be honest: Your side faces the same exigen­cies. Let’s explore each of these issues in turn:

    1. The internal maze behind every “yes” or “no”

    Negotiators are never alone at the table. Behind every person you face is a web of interests, approvals and internal politics. Even if they see the value and want to agree, they have to navigate their own system — con­vincing their constituents who may not share their view or who fear losing influence over this par­ticular deal. If you ignore that, you risk pushing for a deal they simply can’t take home.

    You, in turn, might feel the same pressure. You also have stakeholders you need to please: bosses, col­leagues, teams, boards. You have your own KPIs to meet and you are likely bound by constraints and rules that sometimes limit what you can propose or accept. Even your internal reputation may hinge on “winning” this deal or avoiding certain concessions.

    2. Personal agendas colliding with company in­ter­ests

    Many negotiators are caught between personal in­centives (what’s best for them) and company interests (what’s best for the deal). Their performance reviews, bonuses and next promotion may depend on hitting certain KPIs, even if that means forcing a suboptimal deal or one they know they can’t honor. Their inter­nal reputation may hinge on adopting a certain nego­tiation stance, whether that means pushing for a win, holding the line, playing hardball or rejecting a deal altogether to maintain a certain internal image. If you don’t recognize these personal agendas, you’ll mis­read what’s driving the negotiation and why good pro­posals sometimes get rejected.

    Flipping the perspective back onto your side, you may realize that the negotiation team you are deploy­ing to secure a certain outcome would be hurting them­selves under the current incentive schemes. In complex negotiations, you may want to concede in one area in return for a bigger win in another. But if that involves a key accounter losing their claim to a bonus, this could threaten the deal unless you find ways to compensate or adjust for this bias.

    3. The distortive force of short-term wins

    In some instances, companies reward immediate re­sults over lasting value. In these cases, your counter­part may be under pressure to “score” a quick victory, even if that means undermining future potential. Un­less you address this, you risk signing a deal that un­ravels later — or a deal that fails to capture most of the value that would be possible.

    Again, the same can be true for your own side of the table. If your own organization pushes for fast re­sults and you can’t find strong advocates internally for a more sustainable deal, you may be forced to ac­cept terms you know are flawed.

    That’s why preparing for high-stakes negotiations isn’t just about what you say at the table — it’s about understanding the system behind the people you’re negotiating with.

    When a B2B negotiation gets stuck, it’s rarely just about “the deal”. It’s usually about the people and the organizational intricacies behind them — on both sides of the table. If you’re not prepared to negotiate with both the person and their system, you’re not fully prepared.

    Systems and Functional Stupidity: Why Organi­zations Negotiate Poorly

    If negotiations were just about logic and mutual gain, many deals would come together much faster. But or­ganizations are complex systems, and com­plex­ity of­ten breeds dysfunction.

    People in organizations don’t act as free agents. They act within a system that shapes and limits their choi­ces — a system of internal politics, incentives and unspoken rules. And that system doesn’t always re­ward what’s best for the company. It rewards what’s safe, familiar or politically expedient.

    Sometimes, saying “no” is safer than saying “yes” — even when a deal makes perfect sense. Or some inter­nal stakeholder is blocking a deal to protect their turf, even if the company loses out. And sometimes, nego­tiators are so focused on avoiding personal risk that they can’t recognize a good deal when it’s in front of them.

    Psychologists and sociologists have a name for this: functional stupidity. This is when organizations sys­tematically discourage critical thinking because it might challenge the way things are done. People stop asking hard questions, lose sight of the bigger picture and play it safe. The result? Good deals fall apart.

    And here’s the uncomfortable truth: this happens on both sides of the table. If you don’t recognize these dy­namics — in their system and yours — you’re likely ne­go­tia­ting with a distorted view of reality.

    Because even smart, well-intentioned people pro­duce dysfunctional outcomes when the system around them rewards risk-aversion, short-term wins or self-preservation over what’s right for the business. And if you don’t understand that dynamic — you’ll misread the entire negotiation.

    Negotiating the System, Not Just the Deal

    This is why negotiation expertise alone isn’t enough. You need an understanding of organizational dynam­ics — yours and theirs. You need to map the forces that shape what’s possible, what’s likely and what could block a deal.

    And yet, many people approach B2B negotiations as if it’s only about negotiation strategies or the tac­tics at the table — ignoring the internal constraints, in­cen­tives and political games behind the scenes that shape every move.

    Real negotiation work starts long before you enter the room — aligning your own organization, under­stan­ding theirs and finding ways to navigate both sys­tems. Because in high-stakes negotiations, getting the deal right is only half the battle — getting it through the system is where it’s won or lost.

    What That Means in Practice

    If you want to get the deal and get it through the sys­tem, here’s what you need to do — on both sides of the table.

    1. Map the system. Who really holds power and influence — on both sides?

    2. Surface hidden barriers. Understand con­straints, incentives and risks.

    3. Align your side first. No point negotiating ex­ter­nally if you’re divided internally.

    4. Engineer a deal that works. Think beyond agreement — design for implementation.5. Manage the human factor. Help people say “yes” — without risking their neck.

    1. Map the System — Beyond the People in the Room

    Most negotiations are shaped by people who aren’t at the table. You need to map who really holds power, influence or veto rights, both in their organi­za­tion and your own. More often than not, it’s actors behind the scenes.

    Ask:

    • Who needs to say “yes” for this deal to happen?
    • Who might block it — openly or quietly?
    • Who stands to win or lose (politically or finan­cially) depending on how the deal is shaped?
    • What informal power networks (alliances, rival­ries) will shape the outcome?

    This is about identifying stakeholders and hidden play­ers — supporters, blockers, silent veto players — so you’re not blindsided later.

    2. Surface Hidden Barriers — Constraints, Incen­tives and Risks

    Most difficulties in negotiations aren’t about the deal itself — they arise from internal risks, incentives and constraints. Handling them requires under­stand­ing and anticipating internal politics, power struggles and both tangible and intangible reward schemes.

    Explore this by asking:

    • What KPIs, bonus structures and internal pres­sures shape their (and your) negotiators’ beha­viors?
    • What risks (personal or organizational) make people hesitate to proceed?
    • What real constraints exist — and which are just positioning tactics?
    • Where are internal conflicts and misalignments inside your organization that could derail the ne­go­tiation?

    If you don’t surface these forces early, they’ll show up as surprises later — often too late to fix.

    3. Align Your Own Side — Before You Sit Down with Theirs

    If you’re not aligned internally, you’ll undercut your­self at the table. Many negotiations fall apart not be­cause of what the other side does but because your own organization isn’t aligned on what you’re trying to achieve. Foreseeing different scenarios, including po­ten­tial risks, opportunities and turning points, allows you to settle critical decisions upfront with all rele­vant stakeholders, instead of chasing last-minute align­ment when pressure is highest.

    Ask yourself:

    • Do we agree on our walkaway points and must-haves? What trade-offs are acceptable? Where are we flexible — and where are we not?
    • How do we resolve internal tensions — between sales, procurement, legal, management — before the negotiation?
    • Does everyone involved understand the broader strategy, so no one inadvertently undermines it?
    • How do we orchestrate our actions? Who is co­ordi­nating information gathering, messaging and other influencing efforts so we work in unison?

    Neglecting to align internally is like going into battle with one hand tied behind your back. Internal align­ment is your first, and most critical, negotiation.

    4. Engineer a Deal That Works in the Real World

    A deal that looks good “on paper” but falls apart in execution is a failed negotiation. And yet, deals that collapse in implementation or fail to deliver the ex­pec­ted returns are an alarmingly frequent occur­rence.

    Instead, design the deal with implementation in mind and craft one that survives both organi­za­tions’ systems:

    • Can their team implement what’s agreed — or will they hit internal resistance?
    • Does your own team have the will and ability to follow through?
    • Have you considered operational realities: what will happen when people outside the room need to act on the deal?
    • What support will both sides need for implemen­tation? How will you monitor compliance?

    If you want a deal that lasts, negotiate for implemen­tation — not just for agreement.

    5. Manage the Human Factor — and the Consti­tuents on Both Sides

    Even when a deal makes sense, people are reluctant to take risks that could hurt their standing inside their company. They might lack internal sup­port or face conflicting priorities, making it hard for them to support the deal. To help both sides reach an agree­ment that sticks, you need to manage the human side of internal dynamics — on both sides. It’s about help­ing people overcome the risks and constraints iden­ti­fied above.

    Consider:

    • Have you built trust by demonstrating you under­stand their internal pressures, so agreeing to your proposal doesn’t leave them politically exposed?
    • Have you installed processes internally to main­tain your leadership’s trust in your negotiation team, so you’re backed when it’s time to move for­ward?
    • Can you give the other side what they need to sell the deal internally? How can you make them look good saying “yes”?
    • How do you make it clear to your won people that supporting this deal benefits them, too?

    In B2B, losing face or policital capital can be a real deal-stopper, especially then there’s uncertainty about leadership’s stance. You need to rally support internally, both for them and for yourself. Because people say “yes” when they know the deal won’t cost them politically and when they’re confident it has in­ternal support.

    Mastering the Hidden Side of Negotiation

    High-stakes negotiations don’t just happen when en­gaging with the other party. They happen first within organizations.

    Failing to navigate the systems behind the deal, you are at risk of losing before the real negotiation even starts.

    Negotiating Organizations — Not Just People

    When you prepare a negotiation as if it were just a meeting between two people, you’re leaving massive risks — and opportunities — on the table.

    But when you prepare to negotiate the organizations behind the people, you shift the entire game:

    • You understand what really drives decisions and an­ticipate roadblocks before they appear.
    • You help the other side meet their “behind the table” challenges and set your own organization up to success by creating alignment in thinking and action before you sit down to negotiate.

    Because in B2B, you’re not just negotiating a contract — you’re negotiating the system behind it.


    Hrvoje Zaric specializes in high-stakes ne­go­tiations and strategic deal-making. With decades of experience across in­­dustries, he has successfully led multi-party negotia­tions and shaped transformative business stra­te­gies. His ex­pertise spans strategic nego­tia­tions, cor­po­rate partnerships, and re­struc­­turing pro­ces­ses, enabling organi­za­tions to drive sus­tainable growth and long-term value crea­tion.

    How Crowlight Partners operate

    At Crowlight Partners, we help tackle the invisible part of negotiation: the systems and internal dynamics that determine whether a deal succeeds or fails.

    Yes, we master negotiation tactics. Yes, we are strategic thinkers. But more importantly, we understand organizations — how decisions are made, how influence works and how to align the right people to get deals done. Because negotiating a contract is one thing. Negotiating the organizations behind the contract — that’s where real value is won or lost.

    And beyond any single negotiation, we help clients build sustainable negotiation capability, so they can face the next negotiation with the same clarity and discipline, even as teams change and internal priorities shift. Because in many organizations, negotiation knowledge and strategy are lost between deals. And without a strong backbone, the next high-stakes negotiation starts from scratch. If you are facing a complex negotiation and want to prepare beyond just “how to engage the other side”, get in touch for a conversation. Because your next negotiation shouldn’t depend on who happens to be in the room — it should depend on a system you’ve built to win.

    Do you wish to receive a copy of this article as pdf? Send us a note!

    Get in Touch

    If you’d like to discuss how Crowlight Partners can support you and your business, we’d love to hear from you.

  • Shifting Gears: Europe’s Automotive Industry at a Crossroads

    Shifting Gears: Europe’s Automotive Industry at a Crossroads

    For decades, the European automotive sector has been a backbone of the continent’s economy and industrial landscape. Renowned for in­novation, design and engineering prowess, Eu­rope’s auto industry supports millions of jobs and drives significant economic activity. Countries such as Ger­many, France and Italy boast a rich heritage of auto­motive innovation—from the very first com­bus­tion engines to world-class design and engineering capa­bilities. Today, however, this proud legacy finds itself at a critical juncture. Multiple forces are re­shaping the industry, from global competition and shifting vehicle production to Asia, to the meteoric rise of electric mobility and software-driven auto­motive technologies. Some of the challenges are acce­le­rated further by environmental mandates.

    Against this backdrop, the key question is how Europe can preserve its automotive prominence while adapting to changing market demands and cost structures. The challenges facing European auto­makers are not just operational and financial; they also include significant social dimensions, such as the need to safeguard jobs and reskill the workforce. Ad­di­tionally, the profound transformation of the supp­lier industry—and the substantial financing re­quired for research and development—highlight the need for robust partnerships along the supply chain, with go­vern­ments, trade unions and tech innovators alike.

    This article aims to map out the major trends re­sha­ping the automotive landscape, explore the chal­len­ges these trends pose for European automakers and their stakeholders and finally discuss the oppor­tuni­ties for negotiation and strategic collaboration. By the end, you’ll see how a nuanced understanding of pro­duc­tion shifts, emerging technologies and la­bor dy­na­mics can open the door to pragmatic solu­tions. These solutions may balance economic viability with social responsibility—ultimately secu­ring Eu­rope’s place at the forefront of a rapidly evol­ving glo­bal industry.

    Key Trends in the Automotive Industry

    Shift of Production to Asia

    One of the most significant shifts shaping the automotive sector is the rising dominance of Asian markets—especially China. Histo­ri­cal­ly, Europe led the way in automotive production, with factories concentrated in countries like Ger­ma­ny, France, Spain and Italy. However, lower labor costs, strong government incentives and booming local demand in Asia have encouraged manufacturers to relocate or expand operations in these regions.

    • Cost-Effectiveness: Setting up manufactu­ring hubs in China and other Asian economies can be more economical, thanks to lower labor expenses and attractive investment packages.
    • Growing Consumer Base: Markets like China now have a massive, rapidly expanding middle class keen to purchase vehicles—electric and oth­er­wise—creating a self-sustaining cycle of de­mand.

    Implications for Europe: As more production ca­pacity is shifted abroad, European plants may oper­ate below capacity or even face closure if they cannot adapt to new technologies or cost-com­pe­ti­tive stra­te­gies. This trend also has political and social rami­fications, as governments and unions seek to protect jobs and maintain local manu­fac­tu­ring capabilities.

    Electrification & E-Mobility

    Alongside the geographic shift in production, electrification stands out as a central dis­rup­tor of the automotive status quo. Virtually every global auto­maker now invests heavily in deve­loping electric ve­hi­cles (EVs) and hybrids, aiming to stay ahead of tighter emissions regulations and shif­ting consumer preferences.

    • Emissions Regulations: European directives and national programs increasingly discourage tradi­tional combustion engines, pressing manu­fac­tu­rers to expedite the rollout of EVs.
    • Battery Technology: The “race” to improve bat­tery efficiency, reduce costs and secure raw mate­rials (e.g., lithium, cobalt) is intensifying. These in­novations can dramatically affect a vehicle’s price point and driving range—two key factors for con­su­mer acceptance.
    • New “Co-opetition”: Startups specializing in EV tech, such as battery systems or software, have emerged both as serious competitors and poten­tial collaborators to established carmakers. Strate­gic investments or partnerships with these high-tech ventures can accelerate traditional OEM’s ca­­pa­bilities while also providing startups with the scale and manufacturing expertise needed to com­mer­cialize innovations.

    Implications for Automakers: The shift toward electrification is no longer just a regulatory require­ment; it has become a defining fac­tor in market com­petitiveness. Automakers that fail to accelerate their EV strategies risk losing relevance as consumer pre­ferences and government policies push further in this direction. However, success in this transition will de­pend not just on launching new EV models, but on se­curing stable battery supply chains, scaling charg­ing infrastructure, and differ­en­tiating through tech­no­logy and brand positioning.

    Digital Transformation & Software-Defined Vehi­cles

    Another fundamental trend in the automotive industry is the digital revolution. Cars are in­crea­singly seen as computers on wheels—even servers on wheels—featuring advanced soft­ware-based capabilities, infotainment systems, con­nec­ti­vi­ty ser­vices and semi-autonomous functions.

    • Connected Car Ecosystem: Many vehicles now include features like over-the-air updates, pre­dictive maintenance alerts and app-based con­trols. Developing these systems requires specia­lized software engineering skills and robust cy­ber­security measures.
    • Autonomous Driving: While fully self-driving cars (SAE level 05) remain on the horizon, as­sis­ted driving (e.g., lane assist, adaptive cruise con­trol) is commonplace with automated driving poised to emerge. In Europe, SAE level 02 is al­ready in use. All this requires partnerships with tech firms and large-scale data analysis to con­ti­nuously refine AI mo­dels.

    Implications for Talent: Traditional mechanical ex­pertise is no longer sufficient; automakers in­crea­singly recruit software engineers and data scien­tists. Suppliers who primarily focused on mechanical components may have to pivot to­ward smart systems, sensors and algorithm deve­lop­ment.

    Sustainability & ESG Pressures

    Along with electrification, the broader call for corpo­rate responsibility is transforming how automotive companies operate. Envi­ron­men­tal, Social and Go­ver­nance (ESG) criteria are rapidly becoming central to corporate strategies.

    • Sustainable Supply Chains: Beyond emissions, com­panies face scrutiny over every step of pro­duc­tion, from sourcing raw materials to managing end-of-life recycling for batteries and vehicle com­­ponents.
    • Circular Economy Approaches: Automakers are experimenting with ways to refurbish, reuse or recycle parts. Some are designing vehicles to be more easily dismantled and repurposed, helping to reduce waste.
    • Social and Governance Factors: Pressures around labor practices, diversity and trans­parency are ri­sing. Stakeholders, including inves­tors and con­sumers, expect companies to demon­strate ethi­cal, forward-looking governance in ad­di­tion to pur­suing profits.

    Implications for Industry Leaders: Beyond meet­ing compliance requirements, sustainability ef­forts are increasingly shaping brand reputation, in­ves­tor confidence, and long-term profitability. Com­panies that integrate ESG principles proactively ra­ther than treating them as a box-ticking exercise stand to gain a competitive edge. From circular eco­no­my mo­dels to transparent supply chains, those who lead in sustainable practices will likely set the standards that the rest of the industry must follow.

    Challenges Facing European Automakers
    and Associated Industries

    Workforce Restructuring

    One of the most significant challenges lies in mana­ging the human impact of ongoing industry trans­for­mations.

    • Job Losses vs. Skill Gaps: As production relo­cates to Asia and automation gains ground, cer­tain ma­nu­facturing jobs in Europe are at risk of being phased out. Simultaneously, there is a short­age of skilled pro­fessionals in fields like soft­ware engi­nee­ring, bat­te­ry technology and data an­a­lytics—creating an ur­gent need for re- and up­skil­ling.
    • Social and Political Pressure: Governments and unions are highly sensitive to large-scale layoffs, which can trigger public outcry and damage cor­po­rate reputations. Negotiations often center on phased retirements, retraining programs or re­gionally focused transition funds.
    • Long-Term Talent Pipeline: Beyond addressing immediate layoffs, automakers must cultivate a pipeline of next-generation talent. Partnerships with universities and vocational institutions can provide specialized training programs that match the evolving skill requirements of electrification and software-defined vehicles.

    Supplier Industry Transformation

    The supplier sector underpins the entire auto­motive ecosystem, yet it faces immense pres­sure to keep pace with rapid technological chan­ges.

    • Pivot from Mechanical to Software: Tradi­tional suppliers specialized in parts like trans­missions, engines and brake systems. Many now find themselves needing to integrate electronics, sen­sor technology and software solutions to re­main competitive in an EV- and software-cen­tric mar­ket. Some suppliers (e.g., Continental, Bosch), have created entire software divisions or ac­quired smaller tech startups to remain com­pe­ti­tive in areas like autonomous driving, con­nec­ti­vi­ty or in-car infotainment.
    • Financing the Shift: Smaller suppliers can strug­gle to secure capital for new R&D efforts or equip­ment upgrades. This challenge is especially acute as they simultaneously contend with fluc­tuating production volumes due to offshoring or re­duced consumer demand.
    • Complexity of Collaboration: Some suppliers en­ter alliances or mergers to pool resources and broa­den capabilities. However, merging corpo­rate cultures and ensuring equitable benefit-sha­ring can be fraught with difficulty.

    R&D Funding Gaps

    Developing the next generation of vehicles—especially electric and autonomous plat­forms—requires massive, sustained invest­ment in research and development.

    • High Costs, High Stakes: Battery technology alone demands continuous innovation to improve range, reduce cost and ensure safety. Northvolt have secured over 15 billion in funding to build the world’s “greenest” EV battery and make Eu­rope independent from Asian imports, but they still haven’t delivered on their promise. Mean­while, software investments for auto­no­mous dri­ving can also reach into the billions.
    • Competition for Capital: European automakers and suppliers vie for global investment against deep-pocketed tech giants and emerging Asian EV players. This competition can place pressure on corporate budgets and profitability.

    Public vs. Private Investment: Government grants and subsidies can jumpstart nascent tech­no­logies, but these programs often come with regulations or oversight. Striking a balance be­tween public and private funding sources, while maintaining mo­mentum, can be tricky—espe­cial­ly in times of economic uncertainty.

    Opportunities and Negotiation Pathways

    When set against the backdrop of offshoring, industrial upheaval and intense pressure to modernize, European automakers still possess considerable room to maneuver. How they navigate emerging labor dynamics, policy measures, collaborative models and international partnerships—including those in Asia—may shape their resilience for years to come. The following sections outline possible pathways and key considerations that are likely to occupy the spotlight in upcoming negotiations with unions, governments and business partners—both within Europe and abroad.

    Union and Workforce Negotiations

    Safeguarding jobs while preparing employees for new roles is a top priority for many stake­hol­ders. One area that may gain traction is jointly developed reskilling programs, where union repre­sentatives and company man­age­ment collabo­rate on work­force re­training. Some experts suggest that inte­grating digital ma­nu­facturing, electrification and soft­ware-related skills into col­lective bar­gaining agree­­ments could help maintain workforce stability, though suc­cessful implementation may hinge on transparent communi­ca­tion and shared funding respon­sibi­lities.

    Observers also point to phased re­tirement and early-exit plans as po­tential negotiation themes. Such stra­te­gies might limit the negative im­pact of sudden layoffs while free­ing up positions for redeployed or youn­­ger workers. The key variables here include the scope of benefits of­fered, public sup­port (e.g., regio­nal training grants) and the long-term viability of such schemes as the industry transitions away from traditional combustion engines.

    Government Interventions & Policy Support

    Public policy often shapes the broader context in which labor negotiations unfold. Possible con­ver­sation-starters in this arena include tar­geted subsi­dies, co-funding programs or tax incen­tives tied to research and development, particularly in electri­fication and connected driving. Policy­ma­kers may attach conditions such as minimum job gua­ran­tees or local production quotas, making these in­cen­tives a double-edged sword: beneficial for spur­ring inno­va­tion, but potentially restrictive if eco­no­mic condi­tions shift.

    Additionally, public-private partnerships (PPPs) could gain further attention as catalysts for critical infrastructure projects. Joint ventures among auto­makers, universities and local authorities might ex­pedite the rollout of EV charging stations or create test­ing corridors for autonomous vehicles. From a ne­gotiation standpoint, agreeing on cost-sharing me­cha­nisms, profit distribution and alignment with en­vi­ronmental goals could become pivotal discussion points.

    Partnerships and Alliances

    Cross-industry and supplier-OEM collabo­ra­tions are poised to remain central to Europe’s automotive evo­lu­tion. Industry analysts note that sharing R&D resources can reduce costs and ac­ce­lerate product development—particularly for smal­ler suppliers aim­ing to pivot toward EV com­ponents or connectivity solutions. Yet, for­ming these partner­ships often re­quires care­ful negotiations to define intel­lectual pro­per­ty rights, set milestone expec­ta­tions and en­sure a fair balance of gains for each party.

    Likewise, alliances with tech companies and ener­gy providers may expand. Future ne­go­tiation conver­sations could involve how best to integrate 5G and satellite con­nec­tivity for vehicles, secure large-scale battery-sup­ply con­tracts or de­ve­lop integrated charging solu­tions that bundle vehicle purchases with home or grid-level en­ergy man­age­ment. The precise contours of these deals remain un­certain, given the rapid evo­lution of tech­nology, but effective dialogue among stake­hol­ders is likely to be key.

    Collaborations with Asian Partners: Striking Balanced Deals

    With production continuing to shift east­ward, many observers predict that forging balanced international partner­ships could be critical for European automakers. Asia, parti­cu­lar­ly China, excels in areas like battery cell pro­duc­tion, semiconductors and manufacturing scale. Euro­pean firms, in contrast, bring high-value design and en­gi­neering capabilities. Negotiators on both sides may ex­plore co-development projects—whether through shared EV platforms, tech transfers or joint manu­fac­turing facilities.

    However, cultural differences, regulatory dispa­rities and intellectual property concerns often com­pli­cate such collaborations. Possible solutions might include clear guidelines on IP sharing, transparent in­vestment structures and regular performance re­views to ensure reciprocity. If structured well, these part­ner­­ships could offer European automakers cost effi­ciencies and technology boosts, while Asian par­tners benefit from Europe’s brand heritage and global mar­ket access.

    Toward a Sustainable Future

    As pressing as the challenges are, there is also an opportunity for profound renewal. Increa­sing­ly stringent climate targets suggest that cir­cular economy principles, where materials are con­ti­nuously reclaimed and repurposed, may prove in­stru­mental for the automotive sector’s environ­men­tal and economic resilience. Negotiations with suppliers and policymakers may focus on establishing closed-loop supply chains, incentivizing battery re­cycling and documenting carbon footprints across the value chain.

    At the same time, cultivating regional innovation clusters around research institutions and start-up incubators could help safeguard Europe’s engi­nee­ring prowess. If companies and unions can establish workable agreements on skill transitions and if go­vernments channel resources into advanced infra­structure and greener technologies, the region might find a way to thrive even as global competition inten­sifies. Through proactive, carefully structured nego­tiations at every level—labor, government, industry and international—European automakers can aim for a more stable and sustainable path forward.

    The Road Ahead

    The European automotive sector stands at a junc­ture where unprecedented shifts—ranging from further relocating production lines to Asia, to the accelerating demand for electric and digi­tally enhanced vehicles—are challenging the very bed­rock of its industrial heritage. Yet as daunting as these changes may be, they also offer a powerful im­pe­tus for reinvention.

    The forces reshaping the global market are cre­at­ing opera­tional, financial and social hurdles for Euro­pean automakers. These challenges can certainly strain ex­ist­ing structures, but they do not spell an in­ev­itable decline. The negotiation pathways outlined above ex­plore how a forward-looking approach might help com­panies, governments and labor unions navigate these complexities. Through sensible negotiation and proactive alignment—whether in workforce agree­­ments, forging new alliances or stri­king bal­anced deals with Asian partners—stake­holders can channel disruption into long-term stabi­lity.

    Crucial to success, however, will be the willingness to adopt flexible, innovative strategies that encourage shared responsibility. For instance, collaborative R&D projects could leverage joint investments from automakers and government agencies, while pilot pro­grams with energy providers might spur new EV charging infrastructures that align with both market needs and environmental regulations. Such strategies might not eliminate every risk, but they can forge a more resilient foundation for growth.

    Looking ahead, the opportunity for Europe’s au­tomotive sector lies in embracing change without aban­doning the region’s longstanding strengths. These include a tradition of high-quality manufac­tu­ring, a deep well of engineering expertise and a grow­ing commitment to sustainability. By weaving these as­sets into negotiations—both at home and abroad—European automakers can remain at the fore­front of cutting-edge mobility technologies, even as the global center of gravity continues to shift. In this way, the in­dustry’s current challenges can ulti­ma­tely serve as catalysts for a more stable, sustainable and socially responsible future.


    Andreas Folge is an expert in elec­tro­nic business with over 25 years of sales ex­perience in the PCB and electronics indus­try. He has deep knowledge of global mar­ket structures, industry seg­ments, and key players, including lea­ding OEMs. With ex­tensive interna­tio­nal management experi­ence and a broad professional network, he helps companies navigate complex indus­try landscapes and drive business success.

    Hrvoje Zaric specializes in high-stakes ne­go­tiations and strategic deal-making. With decades of experience across in­­dustries, he has successfully led multi-party negotia­tions and shaped transformative business stra­te­gies. His ex­pertise spans strategic nego­tia­tions, cor­po­rate partnerships, and re­struc­­turing pro­ces­ses, enabling organi­za­tions to drive sus­tainable growth and long-term value crea­tion.

    Crowlight Partners help companies navigate complex negotiations, optimize strategic partnerships, and drive sustainable business outcomes. With a deep understanding of market dynamics and industry-specific challenges, we support organi­za­tions in securing competitive advantages and shaping long-term success.

    Do you wish to receive a copy of this article as pdf? Send us a note!

    Get in Touch

    If you’d like to discuss how Crowlight Partners can support you and your business, we’d love to hear from you.

  • Off-Season Preparation

    Off-Season Preparation

    The best athletes don’t wait for the season to start before they prepare. They train long before the competition begins, sharpening their skills, analyzing their opponents, and conditioning themselves to perform at their peak.

    In business, the same principle applies.

    Many companies have already started preparing for negotiations they anticipate in the second half of the year. They know that negotiation isn’t just a meeting, but a multi-layered process. By preparing well in advance, they map risks, strategize alternatives, and rehearse key moments long before the pressure is on. When the time comes, they walk into the room ready, composed, and in control.

    Others? They scramble last minute, hoping instinct will carry them through.

    The difference between reactive and proactive negotiators is the difference between hoping for success and engineering it.

    At Crowlight, we work with those who want to be ahead of the game and who take negotiation as seriously as a championship. Get in touch to work with us now—because the real winners are made off-season.

    #Negotiation #Strategy #Preparation #CreatingSharedSuccess